data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d481/1d4811ec88bb278fddc9fd272bf10af3baf9aace" alt=""
Option 2, close-up
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/497d9/497d97eb9bf87a9cb5c0ead5b26e27bb0d69708a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e6d7/8e6d7476af5d6d526aee0b54d6e04a15b77e74fa" alt=""
Option 3, full context view
People are always telling us how cute Eddie is. We actually had a bartender in CA tell us he was "Gerber Baby Cute." Could give his parents a big head. However, we figure it's because all babies are cute, it's just something you say about someone's baby, much like telling someone they have a nice home. I keep thinking ahead to those awkward teen years when he won't be so cute...
Nonetheless, I have decided to enter Eddie in a photo contest, just to see what happens. The rules say the photos will be reviewed by a: panel of judges selected at the sole discretion of Babytalk and Good Morning America, based equally on the personality and charm of photo subjects as conveyed by their photo. With that in mind, I'm trying to decide between these three photos. I can crop Den out of most of the photo in option 3 and you get option 1 as a result. Which picture would you enter based on the criteria?
You can either post anoymously, or email Den or me.
3 comments:
I say the close-up. The action aspect still shows, but you get more Eddie.
yep, the close up, for certain. --sabrina
It must be unanimous. A headless Den just dosent cut it, and the full size leads to confusion on "cute".
G'Pa O
Post a Comment